FOR MUSEUMS · MAKERS · CITIES · EDUCATORS

Build one regional Daruma file with the people who know it.

A collaboration should improve the evidence, rights and visitor path—not turn cultural review into a hidden advertisement.

Private review preparation
FACTUAL REVIEW

Review one regional field file

Check a short list of named claims. Corrections are dated, and a reply is never treated as endorsement of the whole atlas.

RIGHTS-SAFE OBJECT

Authorize one object for reconstruction

Define which photographs, views, marks and workshop details may support a public model—and which must remain withheld.

VISITOR HANDOFF

Connect culture to a real place

Pair the English field file with current official visitor information instead of freezing hours, bookings or transport details in the atlas.

START WITH THE USE

What do you want to use?

Choose one intended use. The answer separates what can be prepared, what still needs permission and what is not offered.

Choose the closest intended use

No details are sent. The choice only updates this page URL. There is no name, email, free text, upload, account or payment field.

Citation and editorial reference

Publication

Citation route prepared

Use the Atlas as a route to the named evidence and cite the research release. Copying Atlas text, images or 3D files is not included in that citation route.

Prepare now

  • Inspect the 15-file research release, claim URLs and citation metadata
  • Follow each named source and check the source owner's current terms
  • Prepare a normal link to the relevant Atlas page for use after public launch

Needed first

  • Clear any quotation, screenshot, illustration or model use separately
  • Keep third-party source rights separate from Daruma Atlas material

Not granted

  • No open licence for Atlas copy, images, posters or GLB files
  • No permission to reproduce workshop-specific designs, calligraphy, logos or marks

This checker explains readiness. It is not legal advice, a licence, permission, endorsement, quote, contract or commitment to publish.

Inspect the research releaseDownload status JSON

ONE-FILE PILOT

A bounded collaboration with a visible finish line.

  1. 01
    Choose one regional object

    Name the tradition, responsible source and rights holder before any new model work begins.

  2. 02
    Agree on the evidence boundary

    List the claims, photographs, marks and visual details that may or may not be reproduced.

  3. 03
    Review five angles

    Check front, right, back, left and oblique views as well as English copy and the official visitor handoff.

  4. 04
    Publish an accountable file

    Show reviewer scope, model status, source audit date and material revisions without implying broader endorsement.

PILOT OUTPUT

One object, one field file, one rights ledger.

Interactive object
Web-optimised PBR model with five fixed views
English field file
Regional traits, observation points and evidence labels
Visitor path
Current handoff to the responsible official source
Governance
Claim, image, model and correction boundaries recorded separately

NO-SEND PILOT SCOPER

Define one useful pilot before anyone exchanges contact details.

Choose a role, one regional file and one outcome. The result separates what Daruma Atlas would prepare, what a partner must identify and what remains closed.

Your organisation typeUsed only to label the downloaded brief.
All 15 files have a prepared factual-review packet.
First outcomeOne explicit outcome prevents review, rights and sales from being bundled together.

No message is sent. These choices stay in the browser URL. No name, email, free text, file or payment is collected.

PREPARED SCOPE

Takasaki Daruma

高崎だるま

Capture brief prepared
Role
Museum or heritage body
Outcome
Review the current English claims
Place
Takasaki, Gunma

Atlas prepares

  • Three current source-mapped claims with direct claim URLs
  • A bounded factual-review packet and dated correction route
  • Visible reviewer scope without whole-site endorsement language

Partner identifies

  • A reviewer with direct knowledge of the named regional tradition
  • Claim-by-claim responses: correct, nuanced, incorrect or outside expertise
  • Separate approval if a reviewer name or institution credit may be published

Still closed

  • No image, 3D, logo, merchandise or endorsement right is requested
  • No reply can silently approve another regional file

This is a scoping aid—not an inquiry, quote, contract, permission request, endorsement or commitment to publish.

COMMERCIAL BOUNDARY

Payment would never buy an undocumented claim.

Labelled

Paid work stays visible

Commissioned production, sponsorship and independent editorial review remain separate and are labelled by role.

Permission-specific

Rights do not silently expand

Permission for factual review does not grant image, logo, pattern, scan, merchandising or endorsement rights.

Withheld

No invented workshop detail

When a usable object or permission is absent, exact lettering, brushwork and protected marks stay out.

AUTHORIZED OBJECT CAPTURE

Better 3D starts with the right object—and the right permission.

Two capture tracks keep an improved interpretation separate from a measured photogrammetric record. Neither starts until the object and rights authority are clear.

TRACK A

Eight controlled views

Front, right, back, left, two obliques, top and base—plus physical measurements. This supports a better interpretive reconstruction, not a digital-twin claim.

TRACK B

Overlapping capture

A fixed object, a moving camera and consistent overlapping photographs. This track needs separate handling, image and reconstruction permission.

RIGHTS MATRIX

Seven separate decisions

Reference, image display, 3D input, Web model, download, merchandise and public credit are never bundled into one vague approval.

No files are accepted on this site. A secure transfer route, retention period and written scope must be agreed before any image is sent.

ALL-ATLAS FACTUAL REVIEW DESK

Fifteen packets. Forty-five claims. One place check.

Every regional file has a packet generated from the same three source-mapped statements visible on the site. Hime also carries one separately counted Taketa–Matsuyama place check. All are prepared, not sent, and none implies review or endorsement.

Download the review and rights status ledger

FIRST WAVE · 5 FILES

Factual review plus a separate object-capture brief.

These five files have the clearest first reviewer route and a companion eight-view, seven-permission capture kit. The extra kit does not make them reviewed or rights-cleared.

PREPARED BACKLOG · 10 FILES

The rest of the atlas is no longer waiting on packet preparation.

Each row is one regional file with three direct claim links and a downloadable factual-review packet. Capture work stays outside this phase until a responsible object and rights route are identified.

Regional fileSuggested review boundaryCurrent claimsStatePacket
FILE 005Koshigaya Daruma越谷だるまMunicipal craft or cultural specialistPale complexion, raised nose and the limits of the Edo transport explanationPrepared · not sentDownload factual review packetNo capture kit in the current five-object pilot.
FILE 006Suzukawa Daruma鈴川だるまMunicipal culture or festival specialistGentle expression, changing eye convention and Bishamonten market contextPrepared · not sentDownload factual review packetNo capture kit in the current five-object pilot.
FILE 007Hime Daruma姫だるまTaketa/Oita and Matsuyama/Ehime public-culture or craft specialistsTaketa-versus-Matsuyama name-and-place boundary, female identity, facial features and layered-robe description+ 1 separate place-context checkPrepared · not sentDownload factual review packetNo capture kit in the current five-object pilot.
FILE 008Matsumoto Daruma松本だるまContinuing maker or municipal craft specialistDyed-hemp facial hair, orange complexion and sericulture historyPrepared · not sentDownload factual review packetNo capture kit in the current five-object pilot.
FILE 009Mihara Daruma三原だるまMunicipal museum or prefectural craft specialistBean-pattern headband, painted eyes and internal sounding elementPrepared · not sentDownload factual review packetNo capture kit in the current five-object pilot.
FILE 010Sankaku Daruma三角だるまMunicipal culture or prefectural craft specialistTriangular form, approachable expression and self-righting boundaryPrepared · not sentDownload factual review packetNo capture kit in the current five-object pilot.
FILE 011Koshu Oyako Daruma甲州親子だるまPrefectural craft specialist or continuing makerParent-and-child construction, white body and parent gazePrepared · not sentDownload factual review packetNo capture kit in the current five-object pilot.
FILE 012Utoubori Daruma善知鳥彫だるまPrefectural craft curator or carving-lineage representativeSplit-wood method, rising pose and the role of natural fissuresPrepared · not sentDownload factual review packetNo capture kit in the current five-object pilot.
FILE 014Soshu Daruma相州だるまMunicipal craft specialist or continuing makerGold treatment, fine facial hair and the rare gold-eye variantPrepared · not sentDownload factual review packetNo capture kit in the current five-object pilot.
FILE 015Fujieda Daruma藤枝だるまMunicipal culture or tourism specialistFigure-eight sideburns and the boundary between historic and revival formsPrepared · not sentDownload factual review packetNo capture kit in the current five-object pilot.

These files collect no personal data. Before any real outreach, the project owner must supply the sender identity and reply address, recheck the official contact route and approve sending.

CONTACT GATE

No personal-data form until the public foundation is ready.

Daruma Atlas is still in private source review. A named project inbox and contact record will be added only after the custom domain, privacy notice and response ledger are ready. This page currently collects nothing.

INSPECT BEFORE COLLABORATING

See the method and the evidence trail first.