# Tama Daruma factual review packet

Status: Prepared, not sent.
Queue: First-wave review.

Regional field file: https://darumaatlas.com/types/tama
Suggested reviewer: Town museum or continuing maker
Review scope: Maker variation, Mizuho continuity and naming limits
Source audit: 27 August 2026
Institution review: Not yet institution reviewed
Maker review: Not yet maker reviewed
3D status: Interpretive model — not a licensed replica
Object capture brief: Prepared separately for the current five-object pilot

Please review only the three current claims below. A factual reply is not endorsement of Daruma Atlas, another regional file or the 3D collection.


## Claim 1 — No single face owns the name

- Claim ID: `claim-tama-variation`
- Current statement: Mizuho Town stresses that handmade faces and shapes vary by producer. The model is deliberately generalized rather than presented as a standard.
- Direct claim URL: https://darumaatlas.com/types/tama#claim-tama-variation
- Current sources:
- Mizuho Town — Tama Daruma (Municipal product source): https://www.town.mizuho.tokyo.jp/town/003/p004128.html
- Reviewer response: correct as written / correct but needs nuance / incorrect / outside our expertise / source has changed
- Suggested correction or context:

## Claim 2 — A concentration in Mizuho

- Claim ID: `claim-tama-place`
- Current statement: The town documents multiple continuing producers in the wider Santama area and a strong local concentration in Mizuho.
- Direct claim URL: https://darumaatlas.com/types/tama#claim-tama-place
- Current sources:
- Mizuho Town — Tama Daruma (Municipal product source): https://www.town.mizuho.tokyo.jp/town/003/p004128.html
- Reviewer response: correct as written / correct but needs nuance / incorrect / outside our expertise / source has changed
- Suggested correction or context:

## Claim 3 — Handmade individuality remains visible

- Claim ID: `claim-tama-method`
- Current statement: Small asymmetries are part of the tradition, but this controlled model does not reproduce one workshop's brush signature.
- Direct claim URL: https://darumaatlas.com/types/tama#claim-tama-method
- Current sources:
- Mizuho Town — Tama Daruma (Municipal product source): https://www.town.mizuho.tokyo.jp/town/003/p004128.html
- Reviewer response: correct as written / correct but needs nuance / incorrect / outside our expertise / source has changed
- Suggested correction or context:

## Model inspection boundary

The regional page offers front, right, back, left and oblique inspection after the optional 3D stage is loaded. The model is an interpretive Web reconstruction, not an authenticated digital twin or licensed replica.

## Rights boundary

A factual reply does not grant rights to photographs, scans, logos, workshop-specific designs, calligraphy, merchandising or endorsement. Any permission discussion must be recorded separately.

## Response ledger

Record: date sent; recipient; official route; claim ID; response; decision; text change; model change; credit permission; reviewer wording approval; date published.